<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Write for the Reader First, Tip #5: Top 10 SEO Copywriting Tips to Ranking Success</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.copywritingmaven.com/2007/04/01/write-for-the-reader-first-tip-5-top-10-seo-copywriting-tips-to-ranking-success/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.copywritingmaven.com/2007/04/01/write-for-the-reader-first-tip-5-top-10-seo-copywriting-tips-to-ranking-success/</link>
	<description>A copywriter shares tips, techniques, reviews &#038; cranky commentary</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 15:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: On Copywriting</title>
		<link>http://www.copywritingmaven.com/2007/04/01/write-for-the-reader-first-tip-5-top-10-seo-copywriting-tips-to-ranking-success/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>On Copywriting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 07:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://72.34.55.84/~maven07/?p=95#comment-113</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Writing for Readers&lt;/strong&gt;

After Sunday's Nuts Blogbolts show, Mike Sansone asked if we would individually respond on our blogs to this question: Writing for the visitor is more important than writing for the search engines. Can both requirements be met without sacrificing quality?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Writing for Readers</strong></p>
<p>After Sunday&#8217;s Nuts Blogbolts show, Mike Sansone asked if we would individually respond on our blogs to this question: Writing for the visitor is more important than writing for the search engines. Can both requirements be met without sacrificing quality?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
