2 Reasons Why the Newspaper Business Still Doesn’t Get It
By Roberta Rosenberg on Oct 25, 2008 in Occasional Rantings

photo credit: geishaboy500
The traditional newspaper business, as I’m sure you’re aware, has been in deep crisis well before today’s financial meltdown.
Being the luddite that I am, I still like to read a regular newspaper in the am every day. I also like getting the weekly community paper. But here are two genuine stories that reveal why, in my humble opinion, print-based newspapers will continue to fall and fail.
#1 - If you want me to pay for a subscription, YOU HAVE TO DELIVER THE ##$%$%^$%^$%@ THING.
As newspapers merge and fold (as opposed to fold and fluff), the circulation departments have to make do with a lot less resources and attention. My community newspaper’s circulation duties are now handled by some division of The Baltimore Sun. When we moved here, I actually hunted down the website to subscribe. I paid for a year, 52 issues to be dumped at my mailbox weekly.
After a time I stopped getting it. For some reason I thought the paper had gone free-subscription (some of the local papers have) so I didn’t think much about getting it delivered every once in a while.
That is until the renewal invoice arrived. I called the circulation office to let ‘em know what’s what. Turns out the paper wasn’t free, I just wasn’t getting mine. I was told to complain. I said that’s what I’m doing now. Okay, we’ll extend your subscription and make sure you get your paper.
Cool, I thought. Of course, I still only got 1 paper, maybe, every month. I called the circulation office again, again and then again. Results? About the same.
I have received another invoice. I think I’ll take a pass and read my local news online … for free.
#2 - I want the email offer, SO WHY ARE YOU MAKING ME CALL TO RESPOND?
This goes to the heart of marketing strategy. Smart or bone-headed, you make the call.
The Washington Post has a “get points/get rewards” program. I’m a member though I don’t pay much attention. Yesterday, I received an email letting me know that I could get an extra 5,000 points if I signed-up for automatic credit card payment.
It sounded good until I read the ad. Notice the highlighted area:
I can’t respond via a quick and easy CLICK HERE. I have to call. I HAVE TO CALL?!?
A basic tenant of good marketing is recognizing that the way the customer became a customer is the way they want to remain a customer — via their preferred buying channel.
I’m an email girl. I want to click. I didn’t respond to this offer because they made it too hard. I don’t want to call, be put on hold, etc. I want to click, robo-fill my info, and be done.
Come on, folks. This ain’t rocket science. Email me an offer and let me click through to accept it. Puh-leeeze.





David Leland | Oct 26, 2008 | Reply
Here’s yet another perspective on why journalism has become non-existent. Take a look at the TOC of Time or Newsweek. It won’t take you long to discover that all of the articles are simply editorials - there’s no reporting.
This is a direct result of cutting of editorial positions.
penisförstoring | Oct 26, 2008 | Reply
I agree with you, why should you pay for something that you dont get?? But on the other hand I really dont want everything to be on-line itsso nice with a newspaper in front of you morning tee, different feeling then if you go on-line reading.
Graham Strong | Oct 28, 2008 | Reply
I’m curious to know how this is going to play out. There will still need to be news agencies, but will they be in the form of newspapers? Will companies like CNN start buying newspapers to give them more media outlets while at the same time streamlining content? (Scary thought, but…)
Or will newspapers start moving to a truly pay-for-content-online model? And would that work?
I’m not sure that the 20-year olds of today will access their information through anything besides the Internet or TV (or perhaps some future hybrid of the two…). Which means that newspapers will likely continue to decline, even if they do start “getting it right”.
I hope I’m wrong, but…
~Graham
Graham Strong’s last blog post..6 Steps to a Smoother, Safer WordPress Move
Roberta Rosenberg | Nov 1, 2008 | Reply
@David - I couldn’t agree more, but my focus really was on getting product to the subscribers who stubbornly want to hang on! (I read today that The Washington Post’s 3Q earnings on its flagship newspaper division was down 86%. Breaks my heart really.)
@PFS - You’re right. I love my paper and coffee in the am.
@Graham - We’ve developed an entire generation who doesn’t understand the monetary value of intellectual property - music, books, etc. Why pay when the next guy delivers for free? It’s a dilemma that I don’t see any easy cures for.